The Right to Digitally Disconnect: Tech Policies and Employee Privacy
The "right to disconnect" is a legal principle in France aimed at protecting workers from being expected to engage in work-related communications outside of normal working hours. This law, introduced in 2017, requires companies with over 50 employees to establish clear policies on work communications, negotiated with employees. These policies ensure that workers can set boundaries between work and personal time, allowing them to be unreachable after hours without fear of negative consequences.
This measure was introduced in response to the growing intrusion of work into employees' personal lives, exacerbated by digital communication tools such as email, Slack, and messaging apps.
While the right to disconnect is widely supported in France, its implementation is not perfect. A 2023 poll found that more than half of French workers still check their work emails during time off, and 27% work remotely while on holiday. This persistent encroachment of work into personal time has contributed to burnout, with an estimated 2 million French workers suffering from the condition, especially after the shift to remote work during the pandemic.
Despite these challenges, the right to disconnect has significantly improved the work culture in France. It has helped create a healthier work-life balance, reduced stress, and improved overall job satisfaction.
The UK government is looking to implement a similar law. Employees who are repeatedly contacted by their employers outside of normal working hours may be entitled to thousands of pounds in additional compensation under proposed government plans. These new proposals aim to introduce a "right to switch off," allowing workers to better separate their work and personal lives by limiting employer contact outside of agreed working hours.
If enacted, these rules could function similarly to legislation already in place in France, where employers are restricted from contacting staff by phone or email outside designated hours. While specific policies are still being developed, the core idea is to establish a code of practice, agreed upon by both employers and employees, that defines clear expectations about working hours and when employees can reasonably expect to be contacted.
Although violating these out-of-hours policies may not directly lead to litigation, it could significantly increase the amount of compensation awarded by employment tribunals if an employee's claim is upheld. For instance, breaches of such codes of practice, similar to those set by Acas (the UK’s conciliation service), can currently increase compensation by up to 25%. If employers fail to follow these guidelines, they may face larger payouts if employees can demonstrate that they were wronged by repeated out-of-hours contact.
Ministers are reportedly considering a similar penalty structure for companies found to consistently breach agreements related to out-of-hours communication, with compensation potentially reaching thousands of pounds for affected employees. This approach aims to encourage employers to respect their workers' rights to disconnect and avoid workplace intrusion into personal time.
Employee Surveillance
As technology plays an integral role in modern work environments, particularly in hybrid and remote working models, the issue of monitoring employees has gained attention. It is easier than ever for employees to be monitored.
Many businesses have implemented surveillance measures to track employee activity while they work from home. Employers argue that monitoring helps protect confidential information, prevent data breaches, and safeguard systems from hacking or misuse. However, this raises concerns about employee privacy.
Under Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR), which protects the right to respect for private and family life, employees have a legal right to privacy. Although Article 8 primarily applies to public bodies, the landmark case of Bărbelescu v Romania extended these protections to the private sector, urging courts and tribunals to take the ECHR into account when dealing with employee privacy issues. This means that when employers introduce monitoring measures, particularly for employees working from home, they must balance their need for oversight with their employees' right to privacy.
The UK Labour Party has pledged to introduce stronger protections for employees regarding workplace surveillance. While specific details have not been outlined, Labour's proposal calls for mandatory consultations and negotiations with trade unions about employee surveillance. This would ensure that employers engage with employees and their representatives before implementing any monitoring measures.
Data Protection
Employers must also comply with data protection legislation, including the UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), when monitoring employees. This involves ensuring that any monitoring is fair, necessary, and proportionate. Employers should be transparent with employees, clearly communicating what data is being monitored, why it is needed, and who has access to it. Monitoring must be narrowly focused and limited to only essential purposes.
Article 6 of the UK GDPR requires employers to ensure that the processing of employee data is lawful, and if any special category data is involved, they must comply with the more stringent requirements of Article 10. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) emphasises that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to employee monitoring, advising that businesses should carry out data protection impact assessments (DPIAs) before initiating any form of surveillance.
Employment Policies
While technology has enabled greater flexibility in work arrangements, it also brings significant challenges related to employee privacy. The "right to disconnect" in France provides a model of how legislation can protect workers from constant connectivity, and as the UK contemplates similar protections, it must also address the issue of employee surveillance in an increasingly digital world.
To navigate these complex legal and technological challenges, employers are encouraged to maintain comprehensive and up-to-date data protection and privacy policies. Engaging employees in discussions about the necessity of monitoring and taking a transparent approach will be essential to ensuring compliance with the law and fostering a trusting work environment.
How Can Businesses Adapt Internal Policies?
Employers looking to incorporate the "right to disconnect" into their internal policies can follow best practices that align with recommendations from labour codes and collective bargaining agreements.
While there is no strict requirement for a formal policy in many jurisdictions, it is highly encouraged that employers proactively engage with employees or unions to develop a clear and effective framework that supports this right. Here are a few points to consider:
Support for Disconnecting: The policy should explicitly state that its purpose is to support employees' right to disconnect from work-related communications outside of normal working hours. This ensures that employees are aware of their right to protect their personal time and maintain work-life balance.
Allow for Occasional Flexibility: The policy should recognise that, in some legitimate cases, there may be a need to contact employees outside of working hours. However, these instances should be exceptional and not the norm.
Flexibility with Boundaries: While some employees may appreciate flexibility, the policy must still guarantee that clear boundaries are maintained. This ensures that flexibility doesn’t lead to exploitation or blurred lines between work and personal life.
Communication and Implementation: The policy should be communicated clearly to all employees, explaining its purpose and how it will be implemented. Employees need to understand how the policy works and what their rights and responsibilities are regarding disconnecting after hours.
Managerial Role: Managers play a critical role in enforcing and respecting the right to disconnect. They should receive appropriate training and support to implement the policy effectively and ensure that employees' rights are respected.
Practical Arrangements: Clear guidelines outlining how employees’ right not to be contactable after working hours will be respected. This ensures that both employers and employees understand when it is acceptable to be contacted.
Use of Digital Tools: Specific instructions on the use of digital tools, such as email and messaging platforms, to ensure rest periods, holidays, and employees’ personal and family life are protected.
Training and Awareness: Both employees and management should undergo training and awareness-raising sessions to understand the proper use of digital tools, as well as the risks associated with excessive connectivity. This helps to reinforce the importance of disconnecting and creates a culture that values employee well-being.
The EU Commission’s Approach
The European Commission is pushing for a stronger application of the "right to disconnect" across EU member states, emphasising the need for clear boundaries between working and non-working hours. The European Parliament has raised concerns about the negative effects of interruptions to personal time and the extension of working hours, such as unremunerated overtime, poor work-life balance, and potential health risks.
To address these issues, the Commission has called for the following measures:
No After-Hours Contact: Employers should not require workers to be available outside of their designated working hours. Co-workers should also avoid contacting colleagues for work purposes during non-working times. This would help prevent unnecessary intrusions into employees' personal lives and protect their time for rest and recovery.
Protection from Repercussions: Workers who exercise their right to disconnect must be safeguarded from any form of victimization, retaliation, or negative consequences. EU member states should implement mechanisms to address any complaints or breaches of this right, ensuring that workers can invoke it without fear of losing opportunities or facing other repercussions.
Compensation for Remote Learning: Professional learning or training conducted remotely should be considered work activity. It should not occur during overtime or rest days unless employees are adequately compensated. This ensures that training and development do not intrude on employees' personal time or go unpaid.
The Commission’s stance on the right to disconnect aims to enhance worker well-being, improve work-life balance, and ensure that employees are fairly compensated for all work-related activities, even in an increasingly digital and remote work environment.
How Can Gerrish Legal Help?
Gerrish Legal is a dynamic digital law firm. We pride ourselves on giving high-quality and expert legal advice to our valued clients. We specialise in many aspects of digital law such as GDPR, data privacy, digital and technology law, commercial law, and intellectual property.
We give companies the support they need to successfully and confidently run their businesses whilst complying with legal regulations without the burdens of keeping up with ever-changing digital requirements.
We are here to help you, get in contact with us today for more information.